|
|
 |
Sustainable Solutions:
Integrated Open Canopy Coffee Production
To reduce the habitat degradation and destruction associated
with coffee production we have developed a system in which
farmers cultivate coffee in small (≈2-3 ha) lightly shaded
coffee plantations and conserve an equivalent amount of adjacent
forest. We have demonstrated that “Integrated Open Canopy” (IOC)
coffee production supports forest-dependent bird species that
don’t occur in shade coffee, thereby addressing the deficiencies
of shade coffee for biodiversity conservation.
These forest-dependent species include Neotropical migrants such
as the Golden-winged Warbler, which is identified by Partners in
Flight as perhaps the most threatened Neotropical migrant
species not already protected under the U.S. Endangered Species
Act (ESA). The use of IOC offers economic advantages to farmers
including flexibility to regulate shade levels for optimal fruit
production and disease control, decreased wind damage, and
erosion, and increased pollination services from adjacent
forest, which translate to higher yields relative to shade
coffee. Regenerating forests also qualify farmers to receive
payment for carbon credits under the Kyoto protocol.
Coffee is one of the most significant agricultural systems in
Latin America, where 700,000 coffee farmers manipulate of 40% of
agricultural lands to generate $10 billion annually. The
consumption of wood for coffee processing and loss of native
habitat from coffee production present a potentially grave
ecological threat. In a partnership between the US Forest
Service Northern Research Station, the Mesoamerican Development
Institute, Cooperative Montes de Oro, the Department of Natural
Resources Conservation at the University of Massachusetts, we
have developed and field tested technology for sustainable
coffee processing and alternative methodologies for coffee
cultivation.
These technologies and approaches have transformed this
tremendous cost into a potentially huge conservation opportunity
in the form of market-based incentives for conservation, because
technologies and approaches that save energy costs and increase
yields will be favored, and those that we have developed not
only save energy costs and increase yields, but also conserve
biodiversity
.
|
 |