|
|
 |
Sustainable Solutions:
Industrial Solar Coffee Drying Systems
Coffee Drying and Energy
Rapidly escalating energy costs throughout coffee producing
regions is yet another variable beyond control of the producer.
In Central America electricity costs have increased nearly 20%
annually for the past decade. As the region becomes more reliant
on fossil fuels for the generation of electricity, this trend is
forecast to continue. As coffee processing is highly energy
intensive, energy costs play a large role in profitability and
sustainability for the coffee sector. After labor costs, energy
is the most expensive component of coffee production. Nearly 84%
of the energy required is consumed during the drying process.
According to the Costa Rican Coffee Institute (ICAFE) and our
own regional surveys by the Institute, conventional mechanical
dryers consume 10.5-kilowatt hours of electricity for every one
hundred pounds of coffee dried. In addition, 0.12 cubic meters
of firewood, or firewood equivalent, is consumed for every one
hundred pounds of coffee dried.
This level of energy consumption seriously impacts the bottom
line for the producer and has serious environmental impact as
well. The impact of energy costs is strikingly apparent when
analyzing the cost performance of solar industrial drying
systems installed at Cooperative Montes de Oro in Miramar, Costa
Rica, with conventional drying methods. These industrial solar
drying systems use one-tenth the electricity as conventional
dryers and eliminate the need for fuelwood entirely. The energy
costs to dry ten thousand one hundred pound sacks of coffee with
conventional mechanical dryers with today's energy prices would
cost an estimated $20,400, versus $1,700 using the solar
alternative. While drying on concrete patio requires no
electricity or fuel, labor costs to patio dry the
above-mentioned coffee are $29,500, versus $6,385 for solar, and
$5,490 for conventional mechanical dryers. The dramatic
reduction in operating costs through energy savings allows
payments previously made to the energy utilities to be used
instead to pay for the solar equipment, thus turning expenses
into assets. Refer to Coffee Drying Metrics (under Additional
materials) on this page for a Life Cycle Cost Analysis for
drying alternatives.
Solar Coffee Drying and Quality
In addition to reducing production costs, the solar drying
alternative allows for improvement in the drying process over
conventional dryers and patios. The solar technology
maintains a drying temperature of 45 to 50 degrees centigrade to
avoid harming volatile oils. The solar technology avoids the
prolonged drying intervals of five to fifteen days that are
required to dry beans on cement or plastic patios, instead
drying the beans in two days of solar operation, or in twenty
four hours of continuous operation using coffee parchment as
fuel during night operation. The prolonged drying intervals
encourage the development of microflora - mold and bacteria that
severely impact quality. For maximum quality,
Montes de Oro
exposes the coffee to sun for one day on a patio prior to
loading it into the drying chamber to enhance the color and
flavor characteristics preferred by the specialty coffee
industry.
Coffee Drying and the Environment
In Mesoamerica, an estimated six thousand hectares of forest are
used each year to supply wood to fuel conventional coffee
dryers—this loss of forest is roughly equivalent to three square
centimeters of forest for each cup of coffee we consume. The
linkage of energy and environmental impact for the coffee sector
have led to programs to support the introduction of the
technology through the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and an
energy conservation program now being developed with the Costa
Rican Electrical Institute (ICE). The opportunity to modernize
the aging coffee drying infrastructure faces many challenges
including the lack of credit for capital investment for the
sector as a whole, and overcoming the nearly one hundred years
of experience with the current conventional drying equipment
that has remained largely unchanged since the introduction of
coffee as an agro-industrial product.
|
 |